Over the last few years, weâ€™ve seen a massive extension to â€˜liaisonâ€™ work in mental health services. â€˜Liaison psychiatryâ€™ is now a sub-specialism for those psychiatrists who work in acute and other medical settings, giving specialist mental health support to those doctors in Emergency Departments, medical and surgical wards, for patients with co-morbid mental health problems. We see this in mental health nursing too. Â Weâ€™ve known for decades that many of us would like to see more mental health nurses based in police custody and as time has gone on it has increased and 70% of the population of England is now covered by Liaison and Diversion schemes. Â In just the last few years, weâ€™ve seen this accelerate significantly:
Just to emphasise how far the overlaps between agencies has gone, we also see police cooperation with ambulance services â€“ and this adds to the mental health mix!
It begs even more questions, doesnâ€™t it?! Â I had enough unresolved, unanswered questions about street triage before areas who swear by it also brought about the introduction of ambulance-flavoured street triage. Â It immediately made me wonder: if a 999 call came in about an agitated, distressed mental health patient who had taken an overdose and was threatening to harm himself with a weapon, would we send the police and the ambulance-triage car; or the police-triage car and a first-responder ambulance; or something else? Â And who decides? â€“ the 999 operator?! Â They normally ask which service you need so would the answer be police or ambulance â€¦ or both?!
I also had questions about efficiency â€“ if we have mental health nurses in call centres, whether that be 111, police control room or ambulance control room, do we really need them allÂ when theyâ€™re broadly doing similar things, often at the same time. Â Advising non-specialist staff and sharing information from relevant health records. Do we need three nurses spread across this function or could #Team999 not just access the 111 nurse(s) for support and information. When calls come in which involve co-morbid mental health and physical healthcare issues, does the Force Control Room sergeant call upon the paramedic, the mental health nurse or both?!
The landscape here is getting increasingly cluttered â€“ weâ€™re stepping on each otherâ€™s toes a bit. Itâ€™s not that any of these initiatives is an appalling idea, but these various things are often being done in isolation, no doubt for genuine reasons, but in such an overlapping and confused way that it prompts to ask my favourite question of all: â€œWhat problem are we trying to solveâ€ and my second question, â€œWhy is this the solution to that?â€ Â As an old superintendent of mine used to regularly say: form follows function â€“ you work out what youâ€™re trying to do, having understood your demand, and then you design a system to meet that demand. I canâ€™t help but think that these initiatives are reactions to circumstances that were unintended consequences of other decisions in the wider health system.
Iâ€™ll leave you to contemplate my point whilst I enjoy two weeks of annual leave in France. Â And my point is essentially an old one; and Iâ€™ve made before â€“ this is not a health system, in many important respects, itâ€™s a coincidence.
Winner of the Presidentâ€™s Medal from
the Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Winner of the Mind Digital Media Award.